Source: Civilization.Wika |
Source: Civilization.Wika |
Examples of basic Ecological Feedback Systems Source (e-education) |
This sounds very similar to what I mentioned in my last blog
regarding ‘social complexity’. Actually, this is one of the easiest ways for
civilizations to mitigate the effects of deteriorating climatic and
environmental conditions (Linden 2006). By increasing complexity you have more trophic
levels, by having more trophic levels you have more interconnected systems and
by having more interconnecting systems you have more negative feedbacks to
regulate your ideal living conditions (Butzer 1984).
Though there is a point whereby these systems will become less efficient to cope with the extreme conditions, pushing society closer and closer to an ‘Instability threshold’. Often the point of decay begins when complexity reaches an ‘Angle of Repose’ (Brunk 2002). For those who are not aware of this concept it is best described as a pile of sand, slowly you add more sand to the pile, increasing its height and slope; eventually there will come a point where the slope cannot support the height and it collapses (Brunk 2002). In society, as this point is reached the permutations throughout the complex systems build up and up until finally *crash* it collapses (Brunk2002).
Though there is a point whereby these systems will become less efficient to cope with the extreme conditions, pushing society closer and closer to an ‘Instability threshold’. Often the point of decay begins when complexity reaches an ‘Angle of Repose’ (Brunk 2002). For those who are not aware of this concept it is best described as a pile of sand, slowly you add more sand to the pile, increasing its height and slope; eventually there will come a point where the slope cannot support the height and it collapses (Brunk 2002). In society, as this point is reached the permutations throughout the complex systems build up and up until finally *crash* it collapses (Brunk2002).
A diagram showing the concept of 'Instability Threshold' to usher in change Source (Arctic Council) |
So what happens to the society when it crashes? It does end
well. Political power is lost, there is no order or bond keeping people
together, leading to a shift in low population, low complex societies with very
little socio-economic power or structure (Coombs and Barber 2005). More accurately they revert back to a
nomadic stochastic way of life, which is more stable and more malleable to
climatic conditions. This is the concept of Adaptive Systems and bring us full
circle. So would you rather stay put and adapt, build up something great but
easily undone by the forces of nature? Or would you like to be simple and track
climate for a duller more flexible life.
How would you stand to test the time?